CASE STUDY: Neurophysiological and Autonomic Dynamics of Threat Processing during Sustained Social Fear Generalization
The study “Neurophysiological and autonomic dynamics of threat processing during sustained social fear generalization” by Pouliot et al. (2024) investigates how the human brain processes threat during sustained social fear generalization. This research, utilizing both electroencephalography (EEG) and pupillometry, offers crucial insights into the neural and autonomic responses to fear. This case study will highlight the benefits of combining eye tracking with EEG in understanding complex psychological phenomena like fear generalization.
The study explored how individuals generalize learned fear responses from a conditioned stimulus (CS+) to similar, but unreinforced, generalization stimuli (GSs) over hundreds of trials. A key aspect was the use of facial identities as stimuli, which allowed for a nuanced examination of visuocortical tuning, alpha power suppression, pupil dilation, and self-reported valence and arousal.
The researchers hypothesized that visuocortical steady-state visual evoked potential (ssVEP) patterns would initially show a sharpening gradient, potentially evolving with sustained learning. They also predicted that alpha power changes and pupil dilation would follow a broad generalization gradient, becoming less pronounced in later trials.
EEG and Pupillometry Methodology
The study employed a multi-modal approach, integrating EEG with pupillometry.
A 128-channel Electrical Geodesics (EGI) EEG system was used to record neuroelectrical signals. EEG data was processed to isolate time-varying ssVEP waveforms and analyze alpha-band activity. This allowed researchers to observe changes in brain activity related to perceptual processing (ssVEP) and attentional engagement (alpha power).
Pupil diameter was recorded with an SR Research Eyelink 1000 Plus system. Pupil data were baseline-corrected and analyzed to assess sympathetic mobilization and its generalization to varying stimuli.
Benefits of Combining EEG with Pupillometry
The integration of EEG and pupillometry in this study provided several significant benefits:
- Complementary Data Streams: EEG provided direct measures of brain activity, offering insights into cortical processing, such as visuocortical sharpening and attentional modulation (alpha power). Pupillometry, on the other hand, offered a window into autonomic nervous system activity, reflecting emotional arousal and sympathetic responses.
- Enhanced Understanding of Complex Dynamics: By observing both neural and physiological responses concurrently, the researchers could distinguish between different levels of threat processing. For example, while ssVEP showed a sharpening pattern (indicating fine-tuned perceptual discrimination), pupil dilation and self-reported arousal exhibited a broader generalization pattern that later shifted towards discrimination. This multi-level insight would be difficult to obtain with either method alone.
- Temporal Resolution: Both EEG and pupillometry offer high temporal resolution, allowing for the analysis of dynamic changes in response patterns as learning progressed across hundreds of trials. This enabled the identification of shifts in generalization tuning over time, such as the increased tendency toward all-or-nothing tuning in later trials for pupillary responses and arousal ratings.
- Validation and Corroboration: The congruence between self-reported emotional arousal and pupil dilation, as noted by the authors, strengthens the validity of both measures as indicators of sympathetic nervous system engagement.
Different Mechanisms Underlay Perceptual Discrimination and Higher-Level Attention to Threat
The study found that visuocortical tuning functions (ssVEP) exhibited a sharpening pattern, contrasting with the generalization and all-or-nothing tuning observed in self-report, pupillometry, and alpha data. This suggests different mechanisms underlying perceptual discrimination and higher-level attentional/autonomic responses to threat. Importantly, ssVEP sharpening diminished over sustained learning, while other measures showed a shift towards more discriminatory responses.
The Pouliot et al. (2024) study demonstrates the power of combining eye tracking with EEG in fear generalization research. This integrated approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of how threat processing evolves over time, encompassing both fine-grained perceptual learning and broader attentional/autonomic responses.
For information regarding how eye tracking can help your research, check out our solutions and product pages or contact us. We are happy to help!