Reading / Language Publications

Reading and Language
Spoken Language Comprehension / Visual-World Paradigm
Speech Production and Writing
 

Reading and Language

Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors. Cognition, 108, 290-300.

Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 285-311.

Apel, J. K., Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2012). Targeting regressions: Do readers pay attention to the left? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1108-1113.

Archibald, J. (2005). Second language phonology as redeployment of L1 phonological knowledge. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 50, 285-314.

Ardoin, S. P., Binder, K. S., Zawoyski, A. M., Foster, T. E., & Blevins, L. A. (2013). Using Eye-Tracking Procedures to Evaluate Generalization Effects: Practicing Target Words During Repeated Readings Within Versus Across Texts. School Psychology Review, 42, 477-495.

Ashby, J., Dix, H., Bontrager, M., Dey, R., & Archer, A. (2013). Phonemic awareness contributes to text reading fluency: Evidence From Eye Movements. School Psychology Review, 42, 157-170.

Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287.

Bai, X., Liang, F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing effects on the acquisition of new vocabulary for readers of Chinese as a second language. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S4-S17.

Bartek, B., Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Smith, M. R. (2011). In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1178-1198.

Baudiffier, V., Caplan, D., Gaonac’h, D., & Chesnet, D. (2011). The effect of noun animacy on the processing of unambiguous sentences: Evidence from French relative clauses. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1896-1905.

Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2013). Frequency and predictability effects in eye fixations for skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. Visual Cognition, 21, 477-497.

Benatar, A., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2014). Newness, givenness and discourse updating: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 1-16.

Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 615-634.

Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Laine, M. (2000). The role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 367-388.

Bertram, R., Kuperman, V., Baayen, R. H., & Hyönä, J. (2011). The hyphen as a segmentation cue in triconstituent compound processing: Itís getting better all the time. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 530-544.

Bertram, R., Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2004). Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 325-345.

Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2013). The role of hyphens at the constituent boundary in compound word identification. Experimental Psychology, 60, 157-167.

Bernard, J.-B., Kumar, G., Junge, J., & Chung, S. T. L. (2013). The effect of letter-stroke boldness on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 84, 33-42.

Blythe, H. I., Häikiö, T., Bertam, R., Liversedge, S. P., & Hyönä, J. (2011). Reading disappearing text: Why do children refixate words? Vision Research, 51, 84-92.

Blythe, H. I., Liang, F., Zang, C., Wang, J., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Liversedge, S. P. (2012). Inserting spaces into Chinese text helps readers to learn new words: An eye movement study. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 241-254.

Blythe, H. I., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading transposed text: effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 76, 2424-2440.

Booth, R. W., & Weger, U. W. (2013). The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading. Memory & Cognition, 41, 82-97.

Breen, M., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2011). Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 153-170.

Breen, M., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2013). Stress matters revisited: A boundary change experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1896-1909.

Burton, C., & Daneman, M. (2007). Compensating for a limited working memory capacity during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Psychology, 28, 163-186.

Camblin, C.C., Gordon, P.C., & Swaab, T.Y. (2007). The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory & Language, 56, 103-128.

Cane, J. E., Cauchard, F., & Weger, U. W. (2012). The time-course of recovery from interruption during reading: Eye movement evidence for the role of interruption lag and spatial memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1397-1413.

Canestrelli, A. R., Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2013). Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1394-1413.

Caplan, D. (2010). Task effects on BOLD signal correlates of implicit syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 866-890.

Cauchard, F., Cane, J. E., & Weger, U. W. (2012). Influence of background speech and music in interrupted reading: An eye-tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 381-390.

Chen, M., & Ko, H. (2011). Exploring the eye-movement patterns as Chinese children read texts: a developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 232-246.

Chen, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). Emphasizing the only character: Emphasis, attention and contrast. Cognition, 136, 222-227.

Chincotta, D., Hyönä, J., & Underwood, G. (1997). Eye fixations, speech rate and bilingual digit span: Numeral reading indexes fluency not word length. Acta Psychologica, 97, 253-275.

Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (2012). Discourse integration guided by the “Question under Discussion”. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 352-379.

Clifton, C., Jr. (2013). Situational context affects definiteness preferences: Accommodation of presuppositions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 487-501.

Cohen, A. L., & Staub, A. (2014). Online processing of novel noun-noun compounds: Eye movement evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 147-165.

Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H. (2007). The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading. Cognition, 104, 476-494.

Cunnings, I., & Clahsen, H. (2008). The time-course of morphological constraints: A study of plurals inside derived words. The Mental Lexicon, 3, 149-175.

Cunnings, I., & Felser, C. (2013). The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 188-219.

Cunnings, I., Patterson, C., & Felser, C. (2014).Variable binding and coreference in sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 712, 39-56.

Cunnings, I., & Sturt, P. (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives, Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 117-139.

Dambacher, M., Slattery, T. J., Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. (2013). Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 1468-1484.

Daneman, M., Hannon, B., & Burton, C. (2006). Are there age-related differences in shallow semantic processing of text? Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, 42, 177-203.

Daneman, M., Lennertz, T., & Hannon, B. (2007). Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 83 – 105.

Daneman, M., & Reingold, E. M. (2000). Do readers use phonological codes to activate word meanings? Evidence from eye movements. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 447-473). Elsevier: Amsterdam.

Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 35, 1550-1570.

Delogu, F., Vespignani, F., & Sanford, A. J. (2010). Effects of intensionality on sentence and discourse processing: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 352-379.

Desmet, T., de Baecke, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). The influence of referential discourse context on modifier attachment in Dutch. Memory & Cognition, 30, 150-157.

Desmet, T., de Baecke, C., Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., & Vonk, W. (2006). Relative clause attachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencies when lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 453-485.

Desmet, T., & Gibson, E. (2003). Disambiguation preferences and corpus frequencies in noun phrase conjunction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 353-374.

Deutsch, A., & Bentin, S. (2001). Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew: Evidence from ERPs and eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 200-224.

Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415-422.

Deutsch, A., & Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487-506.

Deutsch, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 393-421.

Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 85-103.

Drieghe, D. (2008). Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 856-860.

Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., & Desmet, T. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: Does an extra space make a difference? Vision Research, 45, 1693-1706.

Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 79-103.

Drieghe, D., Desmet, T., & Brysbaert, M. (2007). How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading? British Journal of Psychology, 98, 157-171.

Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). NoA’s ark: Influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1072 – 1077.

Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Eye movements when reading words with $YMßOL$ and NUM83R5: There is a cost. Visual Cognition, 17, 617-631.

Dussias, P. E. (2004). Parsing a first language like a second: The erosion of L1 parsing strategies in Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 355-371.

Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 101-116.

Duyck, W., Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 663-679.

Engbert, R., & Nuthmann, A. (2008). Self-consistent estimation of mislocated fixations during reading. PLoS ONE 3(2): e1534. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001534.

Evans, W. S., Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2011). Effects of concurrent arithmetical and syntactic complexity on self-paced reaction times and eye fixations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1203-1211.

Esaulova, Y., Reali, C., & von Stockhausen, L. (2014). Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 781-803.

Featherstone, C. R., & Sturt, P. (2010). Because there was a cause for concern: An investigation into a word-specific prediction account of the implicit-causality effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 3-15.

Felser, C., & Cunnings, I. (2012). Processing reflexives in a second language: The timing of structural and discourse-level constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 571-603.

Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C., & Clahsen, H. (2012). The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 67-98.

Felser, C., Sato, M., & Bertenshaw, N. (2009). The on-line application of binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 485-502.

Feng, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 70-95.

Feng, G. (2009). Mixed responses: Why readers spend less time at unfavorable landing positions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(2):2, 1-26.

Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2001). Rowed to recovery: The use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. Journal of Experimental Pscyhology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1079-1100.

Feng, G., Miller, K., Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (2009). Orthography and the development of reading processes: An eye-movement study of Chinese and English. Child Development, 80, 720-735.

Ferguson, H. J. (2012). Eye movements reveal rapid concurrent access to factual and counterfactual interpretations of the world. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 939-961.

Fernández, G., Shalom, D. E., Kliegl, R., & Sigman, M. (2014). Eye movements during reading proverbs and regular sentences: The incoming word predictability effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 260-273.

Filik, R., & Barber, E. (2011). Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader’s regional accent. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025782.

Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116, 421-436.

Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2013). The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: Evidence from eye movements and ERPs. Brain Research, 1506. 94-104.

Fitzsimmons, G., & Drieghe, D. (2011). The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 736-741.

Fitzsimmons, G., & Drieghe, D. (2013). How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 1054-1063.

Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 357-383.

Foraker, S., & Murphy, G. L. (2012). Polysemy in sentence comprehension: Effects of meaning dominance. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 407-425.

Foster, T. E., Ardoin, S. P, & Binder, K. S. (2013). Underlying changes in repeated reading: An Eye Movement Study. School Psychology Review, 42, 140-156.

Frank, S. L., Monsalve, I. F., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Reading time data for evaluating broad-coverage models of English sentence processing. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1182-1190.

Frisson, S., & McElree, B. (2008). Complement coercion is not modulated by competition: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1-11.

Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87-107.

Frisson, S., & Wakefield, M. (2012). Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: A donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock. Memory & Cognition, 40, 297-310.

Gagl, B., Hawelka, S., & Hutzler, F. (2014). A similar correction mechanism in slow and fluent readers after suboptimal landing positions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 355. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00355.

Glaholt, M. G., Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2014). A rapid effect of stimulus quality on the durations of individual fixations during reading. Visual Cognition, 22, 377-389.

Godfroid, A., & Uggen, M. S. (2013). Attention to irregular verbs by beginning learner of German. Studies in Second Language Acquisitio, 35, 291-322.

Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483-517.

Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186-209.

Gollan, T. H., Schotter, E. R., Gomez, J., Murillo, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence From Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud. Psychological Science, 25, 585-595.

Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M., & Lee, Y. (2006). Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 1304-1321.

Grant, M., Clifton, C. Jr., & Frazier, L.(2012). The role of Non-Actuality Implicatures in processing elided constituents. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 326-343.

Greenberg, S. N., Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. W. (2006). The impact of letter detection on eye movement patterns during reading: Reconsidering lexical analysis in connected text as a function of task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 987-995.

Grondelaers, S., Speelman, D., Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., & Geeraerts, D. (2009). Introducing a new entity into discourse: Comprehension and production evidence for the status of Dutch er “there” as a higher-level expectancy monitor. Acta Psychologica, 130, 153-160.

Guérard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., Poirier, M., & Demetriou, C. (2012). Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 227-238.

Guérard, K.,Saint-Aubin, J., & Maltais, M. (2013). The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading. Memory & Cognition, 41, 122-136.

Guérard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., Maltais, M., & Lavoie, H. (2014). The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading is modulated by the target word’s recency in memory. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1155-1170.

Guerra, E., & Knoeferle, P. (2014). Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking, Cognition, 133, 535-552.

Haigh, M., Ferguson, H. J., & Stewart, A. J. (2014). An eye-tracking investigation into readers’ sensitivity to actual versus expected utility in the comprehension of conditionals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 166-185.

Hand, C. J., OíDonnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Word-initial letters influence fixation durations during fluent reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 3: 85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00085.

Harris, J., Pylkkänen, L., McElree, B., & Frisson, S. (2008). The cost of question concealment: Eye-tracking and MEG evidence. Brain and Language, 107, 44-61.

Harris, J. A., Clifton, C., Jr & Frazier, L. (2013). Processing and domain selection: Quantificational variability effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1519-1544.

Hawelka, S., Gagl, B., & Wimmer, H. (2010). A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers. Cognition, 115, 367-379.

Hawelka, S., Schuster, S., Gagl, B., & Hutzler, F. (2013). Beyond single syllables: The effect of first syllable frequency and orthographic similarity on eye movements during silent reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1134-1153.

Henderson, J. M., & Luke, S. G. (2012). Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading. Psychonomic Bulltin & Review, 19, 1101-1107.

Hsieh, Y., Boland, J. E., Zhang, Y., & Yan, M. (2009). Limited syntactic parallelism in Chinese ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1227-1264.

Huang, Y.-T., & Gordon, P. C. (2011). Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 966-978.

Huestegge, L. (2010). Effects of vowel length on gaze durations in silent and oral reading. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(5):5,1-18.

Huestegge, L., & Bocianski, D. (2010). Effects of syntactic context on eye movements during reading. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 6, 79-87.

Huestegge, L., Kunert, H.-J., & Radach, R. (2010). Long-term effects of cannabis on eye movement control in reading. Psychopharmacology, 209, 77-84.

Huestegge, L. & Radach, R. (2012). Visual and memory search in complex environments: determinants of eye movements and search performance. Ergonomics, 55, 1009-1027.

Hung, Y.-N. (2014). “What you looking at?” An eye movement exploration in science text reading. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 241-260.

Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2004). Do frequency characteristics of non-fixated words influence the processing of non-fixated words during reading? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 104-127.

Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2011). Optimal viewing position effects in reading Finnish. Vision Research, 51, 1279-1287.

Hyönä, J., & Häikiö, T. (2005). Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 475-483.

Hyönä, J., & Laine, M. (2002). A morphological effect obtains for isolated words but not for words in sentence context. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 417-433.

Hyönä, J., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (2004). Effects of topic headings on text processing: Evidence from adult readers’ eye fixation patterns. Learning and Instruction, 14, 131-152.

Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F. Jr., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 44-55.

Hyönä, J., & Nurminen, A. M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 31-50.

Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.

Hyönä, J., & Vainio, S. (2001). Reading morphologically complex clause structures in Finnish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 451-474.

Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., Eiter, B., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2004). Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 320-325.

Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., & Radach, R. (2002). A contingent speech technique in eye movement research on reading. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 471-480.

Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979-995.

Inhoff, A. W., Greenberg, S. N., Solomon, M., & Wang, C.-A. (2009). Word integration and regression programming during reading: A test of the E-Z reader 10 model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1571-1584.

Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 803-827.

Inhoff, A. W., Seymour, B. A., Schad, D., & Greenberg, S. (2010). The size and direction of saccadic curvatures during reading. Vision Research, 50, 1117-1130.

Inhoff, A. W., Solomon, M., Radach, R., & Seymour, B. A. (2011). Temporal dynamics of the eye-voice span and eye movement control during oral reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 543-558.

Inhoff, A. W., Solomon, M. S., Seymour, B. A., & Radach, R. (2008). Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective. Vision Research, 48, 1027-1039.

Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M. S., Solomon, M., & Placke, L. (2008). Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning. Memory & Cognition, 36, 675-687.

Inhoff, A. W., Seymour, B. A., & Radach, r. (2012). Use of colour for language processing during reading. Visual Cognition, 20, 1254-1265.

Irmen, L. (2007). What’s in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 431-456.

Irmen, L., & Schumann, E. (2011). Processing grammatical gender of role nouns: Further evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 998-1014.

Jackson, C. N., Dussias, P. E., & Hristova, A. (2012). Using eye-tracking to study the on-line processing of case-marking information among intermediate L2 learners of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 50, 101-133.

Jian, Y.-C., Chen, M.-L., & Ko, H.-W. (2013). Context effects in processing of Chinese academic words: An eye-tracking investigation. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 403-413.

Jian, Y.-C., & Ko, H.-W. (2014). Investigating the effects of background knowledge on Chinese word processing during text reading: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, S71-S86.

Johnson, M. L., Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2011). The sentence-composition effect: Processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common versus unusual noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 707-724.

Johnson, R. L. (2009). The quiet clam is quite calm: Transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 943-969.

Johnson, R. L. & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologica,141, 336-351.

Joosten, F., De Sutter, G., Drieghe, D., Grondelaers, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Speelman, D. (2007). Dutch collective nouns and conceptual profiling. Linguistics, 45, 85 – 132.

Joseph, H. S. S. L., Nation, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Using eye movements to investigate word frequency effects in children’s sentence reading. School Psychology Review, 42, 207-222.

Joseph, H.S.S.L., & Liversedge, S.P. (2013). Children’s and adults’ on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences during reading. PLoS ONE 8(1) e54141. doi10.1371journal.pone.0054141.

Joseph, H. S. S. L., Wonnacott, E., Forbes, P., & Nation, K. (2014). Becoming a written word: Eye movements reveal order of acquisition effects following incidental exposure to new words during silent reading, Cognition, 133, 238-248.

Juhasz, B. J., & Berkowitz, R. N. (2011). Effects of morphological families on English compound word recognition: a multitask investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 653-682.

Juhasz, B. J., Gullick, M. M., & Sheslar, L. W. (2011). The effects of age-of-acquisition on ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Eye Movement Research 4(1):4, 1-14.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recalls. Discourse Processes, 40, 239-257.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2007). Strategy use in the reading span test: An analysis of eye movements and reported encoding strategies. Memory, 15, 634-646.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2007). Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1323-1336.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Perspective-driven text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 319 – 334.

Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2010). Task effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1561-1566.

Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2002). Perspective effects on online text processing. Discourse Processes, 33, 159-173.

Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2003): How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 447-457.

Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51, 287-311.

Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R. G., Luksaneeyanawin, S., & Burnham, D. (2013). Eye movements while reading an unspaced writing system: The case of Thai. Vision Research, 86, 71-80.

Katsika, A., Braze, D., Deo, A., & Piñango, M. M. (2012). Complement Coercion: Distinguishing between type-shifting and pragmatic inferencing. The Mental Lexicon, 7, 58-76.

Keating, G. D. (2009). Sensitivity to violations of gender agreement in native and nonnative Spanish: An eye-movement investigation. Language Learning, 59, 503-535.

Khan, M., & Daneman, M. (2011). How Readers Spontaneously Interpret Man-Suffix Words: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 351-366.

Kirkby, J. A., Blythe, H. I., Drieghe, D., Benson, V., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 664-678.

Kim, Y.-S., Radach, R., & Vorstius, C. (2012). Eye movements and parafoveal processing during reading in Korean. Reading and Writing, 25, 1053-1078.

Kim, C. S. (2015). Presupposition Satisfaction, Locality and Discourse Constituency. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics Volume 45, 109-134.

Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 132-138.

Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262-284.

Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12-35.

Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1250-1255.

Koh, S., Yoon, N., Yoon, S.-O., & Pollatsek, A, (2013). Word frequency and root-morpheme frequency effects on processing of Korean particle-suffixed words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 64-72.

Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2009). Constituent order and semantic parallelism in on-line comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2338 – 2371.

Knoeferle, P. (2014). Conjunction meaning can modulate parallelism facilitation: Eye-tracking evidence from German clausal coordination, Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 140-158.

Krügel, A., & Engbert, R. (2010). On the launch-site effect for skipped words during reading. Vision Research, 50, 1532-1539.

Krügel, A., Vitu, F., & Engbert, R. (2012). Fixation positions after skipping saccades: A single space makes a large difference. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1556-1561.

Krügel, A. & Engbert, R. (2014). A model of saccadic landing positions in reading under the influence of sensory noise. Visual Cognition, 22, 334-353.

Kuperman, V., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1089 -1132.

Kuperman, V., Dambacher, M., Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2010). The effect of word position on eye movements in sentence and paragraph reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1838-1857.

Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876-895.

Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2011). Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 42-73.

Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 802-823.

Kwon, N., Lee, Y., Gordon, P., Kluender, R., & Polinsky, M. (2010). Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: An eye-tracking study of pre-nominal relative clauses in Korean. Language, 86, 546-582.

Kwon, N., & Sturt, P. (2014). The use of control information in dependency formation: An eye-tracking study, Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 59-80.

Lamers, M., & Spooren, W. (2012). Tracking referents in discourse. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 59-79.

Ledoux, K., Gordon, P. C., Camblin, C. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Coreference and lexical repetition: Neural mechanisms of discourse integration. Memory & Cognition, 35, 801-815.

Lee, Y., Lee, H., & Gordon, P. C. (2007). Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Cognition, 104, 495-534.

Lee, Y., Nam, K., & Gordon, P. C. (2009). Processing of the Korean Eojoel ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 345-362.

Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. PNAS, 106, 21086-21090.

Levy, R. P., & Keller, F. (2013). Expectation and locality effects in German verb-final structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 199-222.

Lewis, M. R., & Mensink, M. C. (2012). Prereading Questions and Online Text Comprehension. Discourse Processes, 49, 367-390.

Leyland, L.-A., Kirkby, J. A., Juhasz, B. J., Pollatsek, A., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). The influence of word shading and word length on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 471-486.

Li, X., Gu, J., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 879-889.

Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146-1156.

Li, X., Zhao, W., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Dividing lines at the word boundary position helps reading in Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 929-934.

Li, X., Bicknell, K., Liu, P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 895-913.

Liu, P., & Li, X. (2013). Optimal viewing position effects in the processing of isolated Chinese words. Vision Research, 81, 45-57.

Liu, P., & Li, X. (2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 57-68.

Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Drieghe, D. (2014). The effect of visual complexity and word frequency on eye movements during Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 22, 441-457.

Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2012). The pistol that injured the cowboy: Difficulty with inanimate subject-verb integration is reduced by structural separation. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 819-832.

Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2013). It’s hard to offend the college: Effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 993-1011.

Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2014). Effects of animacy and noun-phrase relatedness on the processing of complex sentences. Memory & Cognition, 42, 794-805.

Lowder, M. W., & Gordon, P. C. (2015). Natural forces as agents: Reconceptualizing the animate-inanimate distinction. Cognition, 136, 85-90.

Lowder, M. W., Choi, W., & Gordon, P. C. (2013). Word recognition during reading: The interaction between lexical repetition and frequency. Memory & Cognition, 41, 738-751.

Luke, S. G., & Henderson, J. M. (2013). Oculomotor and cognitive control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from mindless reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1230-1242.

Luo, Y., Yan, M., & Zhou, X. (2013). Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 915-930.

Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1046-1059.

Mahlberg, M., Conklin, K., & Bisson, M.-J. (2014). Reading Dickens’s characters: Employing psycholinguistic methods to investigate the cognitive reality of patterns in texts. Language and Literature, 23, 369-388.

Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2013). The role of causality in discourse processing: Effects of expectation and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1414-1437.

Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D. J., Avilés, A., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Person and the syntax-discourse interface: An eye-tracking study of agreement, Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 141-157.

Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 644-664.

Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 879-906.

Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2011). Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 327-343.

Matsuki, K., Chow, T., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Scheepers, C., & McRae, K. (2011). Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 913-934.

McDonald, S. (2006). Effects of number-of-letters on eye movements during reading are independent from effects of spatial word length. Visual Cognition, 13, 89-98.

McDonald, S. A. (2006). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46, 4416-4424.

McDonald, S. A., Spitsyna, G., Shillcock, R. C., Wise, R. J. S., & Leff, A. P. (2006). Patients with hemianopic alexia adopt an inefficient eye movement strategy when reading text. Brain, 129, 158-167.

Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., Sereno, S. C. (2009). Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 20, 721-728.

Mitchell, D. C., Shen, X., Green, M. J., & Hodgson, T. L. (2008). Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the Selective Reanalysis hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 266-293.

Moxey, L. M., & Filik, R. (2010). The effects of character desire on focus patterns and pronominal reference following quantified statements. Discourse Processes, 47, 588-616.

Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2010). Testing for lexical competition during reading: Fast priming with orthographic neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36, 477-492.

Nazir, T. A., Ben-Boutayab, N., Decoppet, N., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2004). Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words. Brain and Language, 88, 294-311.

Nguyen, K.-V., Binder, K. S., Nemier, C., & Ardoin, S. P. (2014). Gotcha! Catching Kids During Mindless Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 274-290.

Novick, J. M., Hussey, E., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Harbison, J. I., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through cognitive control training. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 186-217.

Nuthmann, A. (2013). Not fixating at the line of text comes at a cost. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1604-1609.

Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2009). Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49, 322-336.

Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217.

Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2007). The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling. Vision Research, 47, 990-1002.

Nuthmann, A. & Kliegl, R. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision, 9(5):31, 1-28, http://journalofvision.org/9/5/31/, doi:10.1167/9.5.31.

Panizza, D., Chierchia, G., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2009). On the role of entailment patterns and scalar implicatures in the processing of numerals. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 503-518.

Patterson, C., Trompelt, H., & Felser, C. (2014). The online application of binding condition B in native and non-native pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 147. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00147.

Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2010). Eye movements when reading implausible sentences: Investigating potential structural influences on semantic integration. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1516-1532.

Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2011). Building complex reference objects from dual sets. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 443-459.

Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2012). Eye movements reveal effects of visual content on eye guidance and lexical access during reading. PLoS ONE 7(8): e41766. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041766.

Perea, M. (2012). Revisiting Huey: On the importance of the upper part of words during reading. Psychonomic Bulltin & Review, 19, 1148-1153.

Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994-2000.

Perea, M., Acha, J., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Eye movements when reading text messaging (txt msgng). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1560-1567.

Perea, M., & Gomez, P. (2012). Subtle increases in interletter spacing facilitate the encoding of words during normal reading. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47568. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047568.

Perea, M. (2013). Why does the APA recommend the use of serif fonts? Psicothema, 25, 13-17.

Phillips, C. I., Sears, C. R., & Pexman, P. (2012). An embodied semantic processing effect on eye gaze during sentence reading. Language and Cognition, 4, 99-114.

Pickering, M. J., McElree, B., Frisson, S., Chen., L., & Traxler, M. J. (2006) Underspecification and aspectual coercion. Discourse Processes, 42, 131-155.

Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. (2014). Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 787-796.

Plummer, P., & Rayner, K. (2012). Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 950-963.

Plummer, P., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 275-283.

Pollatsek, A., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2011). Processing novel and lexicalised Finnish compound words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 795-810.

Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Stockall, L., & de Almeida, R. G. (2010). The interpretation of ambiguous trimorphemic words in sentence context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 88-94.

Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 261-290.

Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820-833.

Pollatsek, A., Slattery, T. J., & Juhasz, B. (2008). The processing of novel and lexicalised prefixed words in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1133 – 1158.

Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72, 675-688.

Radach, R., Inhoff, A., & Heller, D. (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 27-51.

Rau, A. K., Moeller, K., & Landerl, K. (2014). The Transition From Sublexical to Lexical Processing in a Consistent Orthography: An Eye-Tracking Study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 224-233.

Rayner, K., Castelhano, M.S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755-760.

Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006) Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 241-255.

Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089-1093.

Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., & Bélanger, N. N. (2010). Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 834-839.

Rayner, K., Slattery, T, J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 514-528.

Rayner, K., Yang, J., Castelhano, M. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading disappearing text. Psychology and Aging, 26, 214-223.

Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1300-1310.

Reilly, R. & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55.

Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z reader model. Psychological Science, 17, 742-746.

Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177-206.

Reingold, E. M, Yang, J., & Rayner, K. (2010). The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: Evidence for lexical control of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1677-1683.

Ren, G.-Q., & Yang, Y. (2010). Syntactic boundaries and comma placement during silent reading of Chinese text: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 168-177.

Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 333-357.

Roberts, L., Matsuo, A., & Duffield, N. (2013). Processing VP-ellipsis and VP-anaphora with structurally parallel and nonparallel antecedents: An eye-tracking study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 29-47.

Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M., & Lawrence, M. (2007). Eye movements as direct tests of the GO model for the missing-letter effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 324-337.

Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Lawrence, M. A., & Klein, R. M. (2009). Solving the chicken and egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1553-1562.

Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M., MacLean, G. H., Lalande, A., & Bélanger, A. (2012). Eye movements when reading: The importance of the word to the left of fixation. Visual Cognition, 20, 328-355.

Sainio, M., Hyönä, J., Bingushi, K., & Bertram, R. (2007). The role of interword spacing in reading Japanese: An eye movement study. Vision Research, 47, 2575-2584.

Saint-Aubin, J., Kenny, S., & Roy-Charland, A. (2010). The role of eye movements in the missing-letter effect revisited with the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 47-52.

Saint-Aubin, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 318-334.

Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2010). Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text. Vision Research, 50, 2600-2616.

Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125, 179-194.

Schad, D. J., Risse, S., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye movements during reading. Visual Cognition, 22, 390-414.

Scherlen, A.-C., Bernard, J.-P., Calabrese, A., & Castet, E. (2008). Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: Oculo-motor patterns. Vision Research, 48, 1870-1878 .

Schotter, E. R., Bicknell, K., Howard, I., Levy, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading, Cognition, 131, 1-27.

Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don’t Believe What You Read (Only Once): Comprehension Is Supported by Regressions During Reading Psychological Science, 25, 1218-1226.

Sears, C. R., Campbell, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1040-1062.

Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. A. (2013). Sensorimotor and linguistic information attenuate emotional word processing benefits: An eye-movement study. Emotion, 13, 1107-1121.

Shen, D., Liversedge, S. P., Tian, J., Zang, C., Cui, L., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Rayner, K. (in press). Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 192-202.

Sheridan, H., Reingold, E. M., & Daneman, M. (2009). Using puns to study contextual influences on lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 875-881.

Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1122-1131.

Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). Perceptually specific and perceptually non-specific influences on rereading benefits for spatially transformed text: Evidence from eye movements. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1739-1747.

Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2012). The time course of predictability effects in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 20, 733-745.

Sheridan, H., Reingold, E. M. (2013). A further examination of the lexical-processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 407-414.

Sheridan, H., Rayner, K., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Unsegmented text delays word identification: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 21, 38-60.

Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 482-490.

Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27, 251-272.

Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 776-784.

Slattery, T. J. (2009). Word misperception, the neighbor frequency effect, and the role of sentence context: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 35, 1969-1975.

Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2010). The influence of text legibility on eye movements during reading. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1129-1148.

Slattery, T. J., Schotter, E. R., Berry, R. W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: Making a case for case. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1022-1031.

Slattery, T. J., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Saccade launch site as a predictor of fixation durations in reading: Comments on Hand, Miellet, O’Donnell, and Sereno (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 251-261.

Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2013). Effects of intraword and interword spacing on eye movements during reading: Exploring the optimal use of space in a line of text. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1275-1292.

Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 104-120.

Staub, A. (2007). The parser doesn’t ignore intransitivity, after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 550-569.

Staub, A. (2010). Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 116, 71-86.

Staub, A. (2011). The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 371-376.

Staub, A. (2011). Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: Evidence for a staged architecture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 407-433.

Staub, A., & Benatar, A. (2013). Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1304-1311.

Staub, A., Grant, M., Clifton, C., & Rayner, K. (2009). Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 35, 806-814.

Stewart, A. J., Haigh, M., Ferguson, H. J. (2013). Sensitivity to speaker control in the online comprehension of conditional tips and promises: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 1022-1036.

Stine-Morrow, E. A., Shake, M. C., Miles, J. R., Lee, K., Gao, X., & McConkie, G. (2010). Pay now or pay later: Aging and the role of boundary salience in self-regulation of conceptual integration in sentence processing.. Psychology & Aging, 25, 168-176.

Stites, M. C., Federmeier, K., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2013). Cross-age comparisons reveal multiple strategies for lexical ambiguity resolution during natural teading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 1823-1841.

Stites, M. C., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The psychologist said quickly, “Dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed!” Memory & Cognition, 41, 137-151.

Sturt, P., Keller, F., & Dubey, A. (2010). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 333-351.

Sung, Y.-C., & Tang, D.-L. (2007). Unconscious processing embedded in conscious processing: Evidence from gaze time on Chinese sentence reading. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 339-348.

Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I., (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1-L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1412-1431.

Townsend, D. J. (2013). Aspectual coercion in eye movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 281-306.

Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, M.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235-244.

Tsai, J.-L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds), The Mind’s Eyes: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 159-176). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Vainio, S., Bertram, R., Pajunen, A., & Hyönä, J. (2011). Processing modifier-head agreement in long Finnish words: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 58, 134-156.

Vainio, S., Hyönä, J., & Pajunen, A. (2003). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of grammatical agreement: Evidence from readers’ eye fixation patterns. Brain and Language, 85, 197-202.

Vainio, S., Hyönä, J., & Pajunen, A. (2008). Processing modifier-head agreement in reading: Evidence for a delayed effect of agreement. Memory & Cognition, 36, 329-340.

Vainio, S., Hyönä, J., & Pajunen, A. (2009). Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading. Experimental Psychology, 56, 66-74.

Valle, A., Binder, K. S., Walsh, C. B., Nemier, C., & Bangs, K. E. (2013). Eye movements, prosody, and word frequency among average- and high- skilled second-grade readers. School Psychology Review, 42, 171-190.

Valsecchi, M., Ku®nstler, V., Saage, S., White B.J., Mukherjee. J., & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2013). Advantage in reading lexical bundles is reduced in non-native speakers. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 6(5):2,1-16.

Van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., Duyck, W., Welvaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 88-107.

Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science, 20, 923-927.

Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Verb processing by bilinguals in sentence contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 237-259.

van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25, 1665-1690.

Van Dyke, J. A. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 407-430.

Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 247-263.

Vasishth, S., & Drenhaus, H. (2011). Locality in German. Dialogue and Discourse, 1, 59-82.

Vasishth, S., Suckow, K., Lewis, R. L., & Kern, S. (2010). Short-term forgetting in sentence comprehension: Crosslinguistic evidence from verb-final structures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 533-567.

Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R. (2013). The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: Evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 1143-1152.

Vernet, M., & Kapoula, Z. (2009). Binocular motor coordination during saccades and fixations while reading: A magnitude and time analysis. Journal of Vision, 9(7):2, 1-13, http://journalofvision.org/9/7/2/, doi:10.1167/9.7.2.

von der Malsburg, T., & Vasishth, S. (2013). Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1545-1578.

Vorstius, C., Radach, R., Mayer, M. B., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). Monitoring local comprehension monitoring in sentence reading. School Psychology Review , 42, 191-206.

Wang, C.-A., Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2009). Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1487-1494.

Wang, C.-A., Tsai, J.-L., Inhoff, A. W., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2009). Acquisition of linguistic information to the left of fixation during the reading of Chinese text. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1097-1123.

Wang, H.-C., Pomplun, M., Chen, M., Ko, H., & Rayner, K. (2010). Estimating the effect of word predictability on eye movements in Chinese reading using latent semantic analysis and transitional probability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1374-1386.

Wang, H.-C., Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., Yang, J., Simovici, D., Pomplun, M., & Rayner, K. (2013). Using singular value decomposition to investigate degraded Chinese character recognition: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, S35-S50.

Wang, S., Chen, H.-C., Yang, J., & Mo, L. (2008). Immediacy of integration in discourse comprehension: Evidence from Chinese readersí eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 241-257.

Warren, T., McConnell, K., & Rayner, K. (2008). Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1001-1010.

Warren, T., Reichle, E., & Patson, N. (2011). Lexical and post-lexical complexity effects on eye movements in reading. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 4(1):3, 1-10.

Warren, T., White, S. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E-Z Reader. Cognition, 111, 132-137.

Weger, U. W., & Inhoff, A. W. (2006). Attention and eye movements in reading: Inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades. Psychological Science, 17, 187-191.

Weger, U. W., & Inhoff, A. W. (2007). Long-range regressions to previously read words are guided by spatial and verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1293-1306.

Wei, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 80, 1-6.

Weingartner, K. M., & Myers, J. L. (2013). Effects of changes in narrative time on eye movements and recognition responses. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 283-298.

Wendt, D., Brand, T., & Kollmeier, B. (2014). An Eye-Tracking Paradigm for Analyzing the Processing Time of Sentences with Different Linguistic Complexities. PLoS ONE 9(6): e100186. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100186.

White, S. J., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Semantic processing of previews within compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 34, 988-993.

White, S. J., & Staub, A. (2012). The distribution of fixation durations during reading: Effects of stimulus quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 603-617.

Whitford, V. & Titone, D. (2012). Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 73-80.

Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2014). The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1151-1165.

Winke, P. M. (2013). Effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 323-352.

Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013). Consonant/vowel asymmetries in letter position coding during normal reading: Evidence from parafoveal previews in Thai. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 119-130.

Winskel, H. (2009). Reading in Thai: the case of misaligned vowels. Reading and Writing, 22, 1-24.

Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012). On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: Evidence from eye movements when reading Thai. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 68-73.

Winskel, H., Radach, R., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2009). Eye movements when reading spaced and unspaced Thai and English: A comparison of Thai-English bilinguals and English monolinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 339-351.

Wochna, K. L., & Juhasz, B. J. (2013). Context length and reading novel words: An eye-movement investigation. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 347-363.

Wong, K. F. E., & Chen, H.-C. (1999). Orthographic and phonological processing in reading Chinese text: Evidence from eye fixations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 461-480.

Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 548-562.

Yan, G., Bai, X., Zang, C., Bian, Q., Cui, L., Qi, W., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2012). Using stroke removal to investigate Chinese character identification during reading: evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25, 951-979.

Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259-268.

Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705-725.

Yan, M., Richter, E., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566.

Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., Yusupu, R., Miao, D., Krügel, A., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language, Cognition, 132, 181-215.

Yang, X., Chen, L., & Yang, Y. (2014). The effect of discourse structure on depth of semantic integration in reading. Memory & Cognition, 42, 325-339.

Yang, J., Staub, A., Li, N., Wang, S., & Rayner, K. (2012). Plausibility effects when reading one- and two-Character words in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1801-1809..

Yang, J., Wang, S., Chen, H.-C., & Rayner, K. (2009). The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1164-1176.

Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, X., & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1031-1052.

Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 35, 1192-1204.

Yang, S.-N. (2009). Effects of gaze-contingent text changes on fixation duration in reading. Vision Research, 49, 2843-2855.

Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41, 3567-3585.

Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004) Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 226 – 261.

Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition, 121, 447-453.

Yatabe, K., Pickering, M. J., & McDonald, S. A. (2009). Lexical processing during saccades in text comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 62 – 66.

Yates, M., Friend, J., & Ploetz, D. M. (2008). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading. Cognition, 107, 685-692.

Yeh, L.-H., Schwartz, A. I., & Baule, A. L. (2011). The impact of text-structure strategy instruction on the text recall and eye-movement patterns of second language English readers. Reading Psychology, 32, 495-519.

Yen, M.-H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. & Tsai, J.-L. (2012). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading & Writing, 25, 1007-1029.

Yen, M.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Hung, D. L. (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1033-1045.

Zang, C., Liang, F., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese eeading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 39, 720-734.

Zhou, P., & Gao, L. (2009). Scope processing in Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 11-24.

 

Spoken Language Comprehension / Visual-World paradigm

Back To Top

Altmann, G. T. M. (2004). Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: the ëblank screen paradigmí. Cognition, 93, B79-B87.

Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137, 190-200.

Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264.

Altmann, G. T .M., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 502-518.

Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2009). Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation. Cognition, 111, 55-71.

Andersson, R., Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (2011). I see what you’re saying: The integration of complex speech and scenes during language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 137, 208-216.

Apfelbaum, K. S., Blumstein, S. E., & McMurray, B. (2011). Semantic priming is affected by real-time phonological competition: Evidence for continuous cascading systems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 141-149.

Arai, M., van Gompel, R. P. G., & Scheepers, C. (2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 218-250.

Arai, M., & Keller, F. (2013). The use of verb-specific information for prediction in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 525-560.

Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2014). The development of Japanese passive syntax as indexed by structural priming in comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 60-78.

Arnold, J. E. (2008). THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases. Cognition, 108, 69-99.

Arnold, J. E., Kam, C. L. H., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh- you’re describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 914-930.

Arnold, J. E., & Lao, S.-Y. C. (2008). Put in last position something previously unmentioned: Word order effects on referential expectancy and reference comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 282-295.

Barr, D. J. (2008). Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109, 18-40.

Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418.

Barr, D. J., Jackson, L., Phillips, I. (2014). Using a voice to put a name to a face: The psycholinguistics of proper name comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 404-413.

Beddor, P.S., McGowan, K.B., Boland, J.E., Coetzee, A.W., & Brasher, A. (2013). The time course of perception of coarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 2350-2366.

Ben-David, B. M., Chambers, C., Daneman, M., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Reingold, E., & Schneider, B. A. (2011). Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 243-262.

Borovsky, A., Elman, J. L., & Fernald, A. (2012). Knowing a lot for oneís age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 417-436.

Borovsky, A., Burns, E., Elman, J. L., & Evans, J. L. (2013). Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 413-427.

Britt, A. E., Mirman, D., Kornilov, S, A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2014). Effect of repetition proportion on language-driven anticipatory eye movements. Acta Psychologica, 145, 128-138.

Brock, J., & Nation, K. (2014). The hardest butter to button: Immediate context effects in spoken word identification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 114-123.

Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Dilley, L. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1189-1196.

Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2015). Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 149-166.

Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171-190.

Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 893-900.

Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 62-89.

Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122-1134.

Brown-Schmidt, S., & Konopka, A. E. (2011). Experimental approaches to referential domains and the on-line processing of referring expressions in unscripted conversation. Information, 2, 302-326; doi:10.3390/info2020302.

Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., & Huettig, F. (2012). Speech reductions change the dynamics of competition during spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 57, 539-571.

Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., & Huettig, F. (2012). Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2193-2220.

Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., & Huettig, F. (2013). Discourse context and the recognition of reduced and canonical spoken words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 519-539.

Callan, M. J., Ferguson, H. J., & Bindemann, M. (2013). Eye movements to audiovisual scenes reveal expectations of a just world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 34-40.

Carbary, K., Brown, M., Gunlogson, C., McDonough, J. M., Fazlipour, A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2015). Anticipatory deaccenting in language comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 197-211.

Carminati, M. N., van Gompel, R. P. G., Scheepers, C., & Arai, M. (2008). Syntactic priming in comprehension: The role of argument order and animacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1098-1110.

Carminati, M.N., & Knoeferle, P. (2013). Effects of speaker emotional facial expression and listener age on incremental sentence processing. PLoS ONE 8(9): e72559. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072559.

Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1029-1040.

Chamberland, C., Saint-Aubin, J., & Legere, M.-A. (2013). The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: Further evidence from eye movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 94-99.

Chen, A., den Os, E., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Pitch accent type matters for online processing of information status: Evidence from natural and synthetic speech. The Linguistic Review, 24, 317-344.

Chen, L., & Boland, J. (2008). Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1306-1323.

Clayards, M., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Jacobs, R. A. (2008). Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues. Cognition, 108, 804-809.

Colonna, S., Schimke, S., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Information Structure and Pronoun Resolution in German and French: Evidence from the Visual-World Paradigm. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 44, 175-195.

Corley, M. (2010). Making predictions from speech with repairs: evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 706-727.

Cozijn, R., Commandeur, E., Vonk, W., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2011). The time course of the use of implicit causality information in the processing of pronouns: A visual world paradigm study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 381-403.

Creel, S. C., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access. Cognition, 106, 633-664.

Creel, S. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2006). Consequences of lexical stress on learning an artificial lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 15-32.

Creel, S. C., & Tumlin, M. A. (2011). On-line acoustic and semantic interpretation of talker information. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 264-285.

Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269-284.

Dahan, D., Drucker, S. J., & Scarborough, R. A. (2008). Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? Cognition. 108, 710-718.

Dahan, D., & Gaskell, M. G. (2007). The temporal dynamics of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 483-501.

Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 498-513.

Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453-459.

Dumitru, M. L., Joergensen, G. H., Cruickshank, A. G., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2013). Language-guided visual processing affects reasoning: The role of referential and spatial anchoring. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 562-571.

Duñabeitia, J.A., Dimitropoulou, M., Estévez, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). The influence of reading expertise in mirror-letter perception: Evidence from beginning and expert readers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 124-135.

Duñabeitia, J. A., Avilés, A., Afonso, O., Scheepers, C., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. Cognition, 110, 284-292.

Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Tamargo, R. E. G., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353-387.

Ellert, M., & Holler, A. (2011). Semantic and Structural Constraints on the Resolution of Ambiguous Personal Pronouns – A Psycholinguistic Study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7099, 157-170.

Ellert, M. (2013) Resolving ambiguous pronouns in a second language: A visual-world eye-tracking study with Dutch learners of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 51, 171-197.

Engelhardt, P. E., Ferreira, F., & Patsenko, E. G. (2010). Pupillometry reveals processing load during spoken language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 639-645.

Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345-360.

Ferguson, H. J., Scheepers, C., & Sanford, A. J. (2010). Expectations in counterfactual and theory of mind reasoning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 297-346.

Farris-Trimble, A., & McMurray, B. (2013). Test-retest reliability of eye tracking in the visual world paradigm for the study of real-time spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1328-1345.

Ferreira, F., Foucart, A., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2013). Language processing in the visual world: Effects of preview, visual complexity, and prediction. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 165-182.

Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274-279.

Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). “Some”,and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, 116, 42-55.

Hanulíková, A., & Weber, A. (2012). Sink positive: Linguistic experience with th substitutions influences nonnative word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 613-629.

Heller, D., & Chambers, C. G. (2014). Would a blue kite by any other name be just as blue? Effects of descriptive choices on subsequent referential behavior. Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 53-67.

Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56, 373-394.

Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. (2012). Processing motion implied in language: eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 13, S193-S197.

Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23-B32.

Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition, 15, 985 – 1018.

Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Looking at anything that is green when hearing “frog”: How object surface colour and stored object colour knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 122-145.

Huettig, F., Chen, J., Bowerman, M., & Majid, A. (2010). Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 39-58.

Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 460-482.

Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). The nature of the visual environment induces implicit biases during language-mediated visual search. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1068-1084.

Huettig, F., Quinlan, P. T., McDonald, S. A., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2006). Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica, 121, 65-80.

Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. (2014). The role of the verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1363-1376.

Isaacs, A. M., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives listeners’ comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1178-1200.

Järvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P. G., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science, 16, 260-264.

Ju, M., & Luce, P. A. (2004). Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314-318.

Kaiser, E. (2011). Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1625-1666.

Kamide, Y. (2012). Learning individual talkersí structural preferences. Cognition, 124, 66-71.

Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133-156.

Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., &. Altmann, G. T. M. (2003). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 37-55.

Kapnoula, E. C., Packard, S., Gupta, P., & McMurray, B. (2015). Immediate lexical integration of novel word forms. Cognition, 134, 85-99.

Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. (2006). The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science, 30, 481-529.

Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2007). The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 519-543.

Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M., Pickering, M., & Scheepers, C. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95, 95-127.

Knoeferle, P., & Kreysa H. (2012). Can speaker gaze modulate syntactic structuring and thematic role assignment during spoken sentence comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 3:538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00538.

Kukona, A., Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2014). Knowing what, where, and when: Event comprehension in language processing, Cognition, 133, 25-31.

Kurumada, C., Brown, M., Bibyk, S., Pontillo, D. F., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Is it or isn’t it: Listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings, Cognition, 133, 335-342.

Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W. (2013). Interlingual lexical competition in a spoken sentence context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 963-972.

Leinenger, M., & Rayner, K. (2013). Eye movements while reading biased homographs: Effects of prior encounter and biasing context on reducing the subordinate bias effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 665-681.

Lindsay, S., Scheepers, C., & Kamide, Y. (2013). To dash or to dawdle: Verb-associated speed of motion influences eye movements during spoken sentence comprehension. PLoS ONE 8(6): e67187. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067187.

Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The Dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31, 1-24.

Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Dahan, D. (2003). The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 202-227.

Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition. Cognition, 108, 866-873.

McMurray, B., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey, M. J., & Subik, D. (2008). Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1609-1631.

McMurray, B., Clayards, M. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 1064 – 1071.

McMurray, B., Samelson, V. M., Lee, S. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 1-39.

McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33-B42.

McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2009). Within-category VOT affects recovery from “lexical” garden-paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 65-91.

McMurray, B., Munson, C., & Tomblin, J. B. (2014). Individual Differences in Language Ability Are Related to Variation in Word Recognition, Not Speech Perception: Evidence From Eye Movements. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1344-1362.

McQueen, J. M., & Huettig, F. (2012). Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 131, 509-517.

McQueen, J. M., & Viebahn, M. C. (2007). Tracking recognition of spoken words by tracking looks to printed words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 661 – 671.

Mercier, J., Pivneva, I., & Titone, D. (2014). Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 89-117.

Mirman, D., Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in Aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain and Language, 117, 53-68.

Mirman, D., & Graziano, K. M. (2012). Damage to temporo-parietal cortex decreases incidental activation of thematic relations during spoken word comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1990-1997.

Mitterer, H. (2011). The mental lexicon is fully specified: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 496-513.

Mitterer, H., & McQueen, J. M. (2009) Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 244-263.

Mitterer, H., & Reinisch, E. (2013). No delays in application of perceptual learning in speech recognition: Evidence from eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 527-545.

Mitterer, H., & Russell, K. (2013). How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 977-984.

Mitterer, H., Kim, S., & Cho, T. (2013). Compensation for complete assimilation in speech perception: The case of Korean labial-to-velar assimilation. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 59-83.

Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: Manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98, 223-243.

Myung, J.-Y., Blumstein, S. E., Yee, E., Sedivy, J. C., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Impaired access to manipulation features in Apraxia: Evidence from eyetracking and semantic judgment tasks. Brain and Language, 112, 101-112.

Nakamura, C., Arai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2012). Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure. Cognition, 125, 317-323.

Orenes, I., Beltrán, D., & Santamaría, C. (2014). How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm, Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 36-45.

Paulmann, S., Titone, D., & Pell, M. D. (2012). How emotional prosody guides your way: evidence from eye movements. Speech Communication, 54, 92-107.

Poellmann, K., Bosker, H. R., McQueen, J. M., & Mitterer, H. (2014). Perceptual adaptation to segmental and syllabic reductions in continuous spoken Dutch, Journal of Phonetics, 46, 101-127.

Pyykkönen, P., Hyönä, J., & van Gompel, R.P.G. (2010). Activating gender stereotypes during online spoken language processing: Evidence from visual world eye-tracking. Experimental Psychology, 57, 126-133.

Pyykkönen, P., & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. Experimental Psychology, 57, 5-16.

Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 772-783.

Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 978-996.

Reinisch, E., & Weber, A. (2012). Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 1165-1176.

Reinisch, E., & Sjerps, M. J. (2013). The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 101-116.

Revill, K. P., & Spieler, D. H. (2012). The effect of lexical frequency on spoken word recognition in young and older listeners. Psychology and Aging, 27, 80-87.

Revill, K. P., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Context and spoken word recognition in a novel lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1207-1223.

Rommers, J., Meyer, A. S., Praamstra, P., & Huettig, F. (2013). The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: Activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to. Neuropsychologia, 51, 437-447.

Sajin, S. M., & Connine, C. M. (2014). Semantic richness: The role of semantic features in processing spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 13-35.

Salverda, A. P., Kleinschmidt, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014). Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 145-163.

Salverda, A. P., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Attentional capture of objects referred to by spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1122-1133.

Salverda, A. P., Dahan, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90, 51-89.

Salverda, A. P., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). Tracking the time course of orthographic information in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1108-1117.

Scheepers, C., Keller, F., & Lapata, M. (2008). Evidence for serial coercion: A time course analysis using the visual-world paradigm. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 1-29.

Shatzman, K. B., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). The modulation of lexical competition by segment duration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 966-971.

Shatzman, K. B., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Prosodic knowledge affects the recognition of newly acquired words. Psychological Science, 17, 372-377.

Shatzman, K. B., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken-word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1-16.

Shen, J., Deutsch, D., & Rayner, K. (2013). On-line perception of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3: evidence from eye movements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(5):3016-3029.

Speed, L. J., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Eye movements reveal the dynamic simulation of speed in language. Cognitive Science, 38, 367-382.

Staub, A., Abbott, M., & Bogartz, R. S. (2012). Linguistically guided anticipatory eye movements in scene viewing. Visual Cognition, 20, 922-946.

Staudte, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2011). Investigating joint attention mechanisms through spoken human-robot interaction. Cognition, 120, 268-291.

Staudte, M., Crocker, M. W., Heloir, A., & Kipp, M. (2014). The influence of speaker gaze on listener comprehension: Contrasting visual versus intentional accounts, Cognition, 133, 317-328.

Sulpizio, S., & McQueen, J. M. (2012). Italians use abstract knowledge about lexical stress during spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 177-193.

Toscano, J. C., & McMurray, B. (2012). Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1284-1301.

Toscano, J. C., Anderson, N. D., & McMurray, B. (2013). Reconsidering the role of temporal order in spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 981-987.

Tremblay, A. (2011). Learning to parse liaison-initial words: An eye-tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 257-279.

Tremblay, A., & Spinelli, E. (2013). Segmenting liaison-initial words: The role of predictive dependencies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1093-1113.

Tremblay, A., & Spinelli, E. (2014). English Listeners’ Use of Distributional and Acoustic-Phonetic Cues to Liaison in French: Evidence from Eye Movements. Language and Speech, 57, 310-337.

Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2014). Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 237-257.

Trude, A. M., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). Talker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 979-1001.

Trude, A. M., Tremblay, A., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2013). Limitations on adaptation to foreign accents. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 349-367.

Tsang, C., & Chambers, C. G. (2011). Appearances aren’t everything: Shape classifiers and referential processing in Cantonese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1065-1080.

Tsang, Y.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2010). Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: Activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 875-881.

Tuinman, A., Mitterer, H., & Cutler, A. (2012). Resolving ambiguity in familiar and unfamiliar casual speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 530-544.

Weber, A., Braun, B., & Crocker, M. (2006). Finding referents in time: Eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents. Language and Speech, 49, 367-392.

Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1, 1-25.

Weber, A., & Crocker, M. W. (2012). On the nature of semantic constraints on lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 195-214.

Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99, B63-B72.

White, K. S., Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Morgan, J. L. (2013). Adults show less sensitivity to phonetic detail in unfamiliar words, too. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 362-378.

Wolter, L., Gorman, K. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Scalar reference, contrast and discourse: Separating effects of linguistic discourse from availability of the referent. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 299-317.

Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology, 56, 165-209.

Wu, F., Luo, Y., & Zhou, X. (2014). Building Chinese relative clause structures with lexical and syntactic cues: evidence from visual world eye-tracking and reading times. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 1205-1226.

Yee, E., Blumstein, S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2008). Lexical-semantic activation in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 592-612.

Yee, E., Huffstetler, S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2011). Function follows form: Activation of shape and function features during object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 348-363.

Yee, E., Overton, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Looking for meaning: Eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 869-874.

Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 1-14.

Yoon, S. O. & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2014). Adjusting conceptual pacts in three-party conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 919-937.

 

Speech Production and Writing

Back To Top

Alamargot, D., Plane, S., Lambert, E., & Chesnet, D. (2010). Using eye and pen movements to trace the development of writing expertise: case studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th grader, graduate student, and professional writer. Reading and Writing, 23, 853-888.

Belke, E. (2006). Visual determinants of preferred adjective order. Visual Cognition, 14, 261-294.

Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 667-692.

Bölte, J., Böhl, A., Dobel, C., & Zwitserlood, P. (2009). Effects of referential ambiguity, time constraints and addressee orientation on the production of morphologically complex words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1166-1199.

Brock, J. & Bzishvili, S. (2013). Deconstructing Frith and Snowling’s homograph-reading task: Implications for autism spectrum disorders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1764-1773.

Clarke, A.D.F., Coco, M.I., & Keller, F. (2013). The impact of attentional, linguistic, and visual features during object naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 4:927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00927.

Coco, M. I., & Keller, F. (2012). Scan patterns predict sentence production in the cross-modal processing of visual scenes. Cognitive Science, 36, 1204-1223.

De Luca, M., Pontillo, M., Primativo, S., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2013). The eye-voice lead during oral reading in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7:696. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00696.

Ganushchak, L. Y., Konopka, A. E., & Chen, Y. (2014). What the eyes say about planning of focused referents during sentence formulation: a cross-linguistic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1124. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01124.

Hatzidaki, A., Jones, M. W., Santesteban, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2014). It’s not what you see: it’s the language you say it in. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 1233-1239.

Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2008). When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production. Memory & Cognition, 36, 341-360.

Huettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 347-374.

Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V.-M., & Koskela, K. (2009). The role of anticipation in reading. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17, 509-526.

Konopka, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Priming sentence planning, Cognitive Psychology, 73, 1-40.

Korvorst, M., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2006) Incrementality in naming and reading complex numerals: Evidence from eyetracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 296-311.

Kuchinsky, S. E., Bock, K., & Irwin, D. E. (2011). Reversing the hands of time: Changing the mapping from seeing to saying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 748-756.

Lambert, E., Alamargot, D., Larocque, D., & Caporossi, G. (2011). Dynamics of the spelling process during a copy task: Effects of regularity and frequency. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 141-150.

Malpass, D., & Meyer, A. S. (2010). The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: Evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 523-537.

Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Häcker, C., & Mortensen, L. (2007). Use of word length information in utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 210-231.

Meyer, A. S., Ouellet, M., & Häcker, C. (2008). Parallel processing of objects in a naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 982-987.

Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 131-147.

Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.

Meyer, A. S., & van der Meulen, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 314-319.

Meyer, A. S., van der Meulen, F. F., & Brooks, A. (2004). Eye movements during speech planning: Talking about present and remembered objects. Visual Cognition, 11, 553 – 576.

Meyer, A. S., Wheeldon, L., van der Meulen, F., & Konopka, A. (2012). Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 3:39. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00039.

Moll, K. & Jones, M. (2013). Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers: Differential effects of visual crowding in foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2085-2091.

Morgan, J. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 428-442.

Morgan, J. L., van Elswijk, G., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Extrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: Evidence from word probe experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 561-565.

Myachykov, A., Thompson, D., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2012). Referential and visual cues to structural choice in visually situated sentence production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00396.

Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2012). Determinants of structural choice in visually situated sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 141, 304-315.

Nottbusch, G. (2010). Grammatical planning, execution, and control in written sentence production. Reading and Writing, 23, 777-801.

Pan, J., Yan, M., Laubrock, J., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Eye-voice span during rapid automatized naming of digits and dice in Chinese normal and dyslexic children. Developmental Science, 16, 967-979.

Roelofs, A. (2007). Attention and gaze control in picture naming, word reading, and word categorizing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 232-251.

Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 353-368.

Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1580-1598.

Roelofs, A. (2011). Attention, exposure duration, and gaze shifting in naming performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 860-873.

Schotter, E. R., Jia, A., Ferreira, V. S., & Rayner, K. (2014). Preview benefit in speaking occurs regardless of preview timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 755-62.

Sevilla, Y., Maldonado, M., & Shalóm, D. E. (2014). Pupillary dynamics reveal computational cost in sentence planning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1041-1052.

Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, Pages 304-324.

Swets, B., Jacovina, M. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Individual differences in the scope of speech planning: evidence from eye-movements. Language and Cognition, 6, 12-44.

van der Meulen, F. F., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition, 29, 512-521.

van de Velde, M., Meyer, A. S., & Konopka, A. E. (2014). Message formulation and structural assembly: Describing “easy” and “hard” events with preferred and dispreferred syntactic structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 124-144.

Van Waes, L., Leijten, M., & Quinlan, T. (2010). Reading during sentence composing and error correction: A multilevel analysis of the influences of task complexity. Reading and Writing, 23, 803-834.

Yoon, S. O., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2013). Lexical differentiation in language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 397-416.

Back To Top