Gaze Contingent Publications

Gaze-Contingent Display
Boundary Paradigm
Saccade Contingent/Transsacadic Perception
Gaze Control/Selection by Eye

Gaze-Contingent Display (moving-window paradigm/artificial scotoma)

Aguilar, C., & Castet, E. (2011). Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: Some potential pitfalls and remedies. Vision Research, 51, 997-1012.

Bernard, J.-B., Scherlen, A.-C., & Castet, E. (2007). Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: A modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed. Vision Research, 47, 3447-3459.

Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465-1477.

Calvo, M. G., & Avero, P. (2008). Affective priming of emotional pictures in parafoveal vision: Left visual field advantage. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8:41-53.

Calvo, M. G., & Eysenck, M. W. (2008). Affective significance enhances covert attention: Roles of anxiety and word familiarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Perception, 61, 1669 - 1686.

Cañal-Bruland, R., Lotz, S., Hagemann, N., Schorer, J., & Strauss, B. (2011). Visual span and change detection in soccer: An expertise study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 302-310.

Chan, J. P. K., Kamino, D., Binns, M. A., & Ryan, J. D. (2011) Can changes in eye movement scanning alter the age-related deficit in recognition memory?. Frontiers in Psychology, 2:92. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00092.

Cornelissen, F. W., Bruin, K. J., & Kooijman, A. C. (2005). The influence of artificial scotomas on eye-movements during visual search. Optometry & Visual Science, 82. 27-35.

Cornelissen, F. W., & van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. (1999). Heading detection with simulated visual field defects. Visual Impairment Research, 1, 71-84.

Dalrymple, K. A., Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., Barton, J. J. S., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Experiencing simultanagnosia through windowed viewing of complex social scenes. Brain Research, 1367, 265-277.

Dalrymple, K. A., Bischof, W. F., Cameron, D., Barton, J. J. S., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Simulating simultanagnosia: Spatially constricted vision mimics local capture and the global processing deficit. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 445-455.

Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., & Pelizzone, M. (2011). Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5:57. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00057.

Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., Pelizzone, M., & Safran, A. B. (2006). Processes involved in oculomotor adaptation to eccentric reading. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47, 1439 - 1447.

Fornos, A. P., Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, M. (2005). Simulation of artificial vision, III: Do the spatial or temporal characteristics of stimulus pixelization really matter? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 46, 3906-3912.

Foulsham, T., Teszka, R., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 266-283.

Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2011). If visual saliency predicts search, then why? Evidence from normal and gaze-contingent search tasks in natural scenes. Cognitive Computation, 3, 48-63.

Gilman, E., & Underwood, G. (2003). Restricting the field of view to investigate the perceptual spans of pianists. Visual Cognition, 10, 201-232.

Gilman, E., & Underwood, G. (2003). The perceptual span during music reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The Mind's Eyes: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (pp. 175-191). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Garaas, T. W., Nieuwenhuis, T., & Pomplun, M. (2008). A Gaze-contingent paradigm for studying continuous saccadic adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 168, 334-340.

Garaas, T. W., & Pomplun, M. (2011). Distorted object perception following whole-field adaptation of saccadic eye movements. Journal of Vision, 11(1):2, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/1/2, doi:10.1167/11.1.2.

Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2009). The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition, 17, 1228-1243.

Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2011). Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, & Economics, 4, 125-146.

Greene, H. H., & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search. Vision Research, 41, 3763-3773.

Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 167-181.

Hsiao, J. H.-W., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science, 19, 998 - 1006.

Johnson, A., & Gurnsey, R. (2010). Size scaling compensates for sensitivity loss produced by a simulated central scotoma in a shape-from-texture task. Journal of Vision, 10(12):18, 1-16, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/12/18, doi:10.1167/10.12.18.

Kramer, A. F., Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. S., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, A., & Scialfa, C. T. (2006). Aging, memory and visual search. Acta Psychologica, 122, 288-304.

Lingnau, A., Schwarzbach, J., & Vorberg, D. (2008). Adaptive strategies for reading with a forced retinal location. Journal of Vision, 8(5):6, 1-18, http://journalofvision.org/8/5/6/, doi:10.1167/8.5.6.

Macedo, A. F., Crossland, M. D., & Rubin, G. S. (2008). The effect of retinal image slip on peripheral visual acuity. Journal of Vision, 8(14):16, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/8/14/16/, doi:10.1167/8.14.16.

Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., Sereno, S. C. (2009). Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 20, 721-728.

Mitra, A. R., Abegg, M., Viswanathan, J., & Barton, J. J. S. (2010). Line bisection in simulated homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1742-1749.

Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., & Shen, J. (2001). Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects of task difficulty and divided attention. Cognition, 81, B57-B67.

Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., & Shen, J. (2001). The effects of peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm. Vision Research, 41, 2757-2769.

Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. (2009). Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24, 755-760.

Rayner, K., & Johnson, R. L. (2005). Letter-by-letter acquired dyslexia is due to the serial encoding of letters. Psychological Science, 16, 530-534.

Reingold, E. M. (2002). On the perceptual specificity of memory representations. Memory, 10, 365-379.

Reingold, E. M., & Loschky, L. C. (2002). Saliency of peripheral targets in gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 491-499.

Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In Kennedy, Alan, Radach, Ralph et al. (Eds.) Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119-145). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers.

Scherlen, A.-C., Bernard, J.-P., Calabrese, A., & Castet, E. (2008). Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: Oculo-motor patterns. Vision Research, 48, 1870-1878 .

Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2006). Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vision Research, 46, 3331-3335.

Simpson, S. A., Abegg, M., & Barton, J. J. S. (2011). Rapid adaptation of visual search in simulated hemianopia. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1593-1601.

Sommerhalder, G., Oueghlani, E., Bagnoud, B., Leonards, U., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, P. (2003). Simulation of artificial vision: I. Eccentric reading of isolated words, and perceptual learning. Vision Research, 43, 269-283.

Sommerhalder, J., Rappaz, B., de Haller, R., Fornos, A. P., Safran, A. B., & Pelizzone, M. (2004). Simulation of artificial vision: II. Eccentric reading of full-page text and the learning of this task. Vision Research, 44, 1693-1706.

Van Belle, G., De Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., Rossion, B., & Lefèvre, P. (2010). Face inversion impairs holistic perception: Evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. Journal of Vision, 10(5):10, 1-13, http://journalofvision.org/content/10/5/10, doi:10.1167/10.5.10.

Van Belle, G., Lefèvre, P., Laguesse, R., Busigny, T., de Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., & Rossion, B. (2010). Feature-based processing of personally familiar faces in prosopagnosia: Evidence from eye-gaze contingency. Behavioural Neurology, 23, 255-257.

Varsori, M., Perez-Fornos, A., Safran, A. B., & Whatham, A. R. (2004). Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma. Vision Research, 44, 2691-2705.

Yang, S.-N. (2009). Effects of gaze-contingent text changes on fixation duration in reading. Vision Research, 49, 2843-2855.

Boundary Paradigm

Angele, B., Slattery, T., Yang, J., Kliegl, R., & Rayner, K. (2008). Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously. Visual Cognition, 16, 697 - 707.

Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Pelleg, S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415-422.

Deutsch, A., & Frost, R., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 487-506.

Drieghe, D., Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2010). Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary. Cognition, 116, 136-142.

Eiter, B. M., & Inhoff, A. W. (2010). Visual word recognition during reading is followed by subvocal articulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 457-470.

Häikiö, T., Hyönä, J., Bertram, R. (2010). Development of parafoveal processing within and across words in reading: Evidence from the boundary paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1982-1998.

Hohenstein, S., Laubrock, J., & Kliegl, R. (2010). Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1150-1170.

Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 936-949.

Hyönä, J., Bertram, R., & Pollatsek, A. (2004). Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 523-532.

Hyönä, J., & Häikiö, T. (2005). Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 475-483.

Inhoff, A. W., Connine, C., Eiter, B., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2004). Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 320-325.

Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979-995.

Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Eiter, B., & Juhasz, B. (2003). Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 803-827.

Inhoff, A. W., Solomon, M. S., Seymour, B. A., & Radach, R. (2008). Eye position changes during reading fixations are spatially selective. Vision Research, 48, 1027-1039.

Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1250-1255.

McDonald, S. A. (2006). Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal. Vision Research, 46, 4416-4424.

Morgan, J. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 428-442.

Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2010). Testing for lexical competition during reading: Fast priming with orthographic neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 36, 477-492.

Perea, M., Nakatani, C., & van Leeuwen, C. (2011). Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: Are they orthographic in nature? Memory & Cognition, 39, 700-707.

Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 261-290.

Rayner, K., Castelhano, M.S., & Yang, J. (2010). Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 25, 714-718.

Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26, 451-460.

Slattery, T. J., Schotter, E. R., Berry, R. W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: Making a case for case. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1022-1031.

Tsai, J.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Yen, N.-S. (2004). Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: Evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences. Brain and Language, 91, 235-244.

Wang, C.-A., & Inhoff, A. W. (2010). The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 805-817.

Wang, C.-A., Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (2009). Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1487-1494.

Wang, C.-A., Tsai, J.-L., Inhoff, A. W., & Tzeng, O. J.-L. (2009). Acquisition of linguistic information to the left of fixation during the reading of Chinese text. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1097-1123.

White, S. J., Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Semantic processing of previews within compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 34, 988-993.

Yan, M., Richter, E., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Chinese readers extract semantic information from parafoveal words during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561-566.

Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. (2010). Parafoveal load of word n+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word n+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1669-1676.

Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 35, 1192-1204.

Yen, M.-H., Tsai, J.-L., Tzeng, O. J.-L., & Hung, D. L. (2008). Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1033-1045.

Saccade Contingent/Transsacadic Perception (no saccade adpatation )

Chapman, C. S., Hunt, A. R. & Kingstone, A. (2007). Squeezing uncertainty from saccadic compression. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 1(1):2, 1-5, http://jemr.org/.

Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). Limits on integrating motion information across saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 44-54.

Dickinson, C. A., & Intraub, H. (2008). Transsaccadic representation of layout: What is the time course of boundary extension? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 543-555.

Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2002). Programming of exogenous and endogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1039-1054.

Gordon, R. D., & Vollmer, S. D. (2010). Episodic representation of diagnostic and nondiagnostic object colour. Visual Cognition, 18, 728-750.

Gordon, R. D., Vollmer, S. D., & Frankl, M. L. (2008). Object continuity and the transsaccadic representation of form. Perception and Psychophysics, 70, 667-679.

Gysen, V., De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Detection of intrasaccadic displacements and depth rotations of moving objects. Vision Research, 42, 379-391.

Gysen, V., Verfaillie, K., & De Graef, P. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of translating objects: Effects of landmark objects and visual field position. Vision Research, 42, 1785-1796.

Gysen, V., Verfaillie, K., & De Graef, P. (2002). The effect of stimulus blanking on the detection of intrasaccadic displacements of translating objects. Vision Research, 42, 2021-2030.

Henderson, J. M., & Pierce, G. L. (2008). Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 566-573.

Intraub, H. & Dickinson, C. A. (2008). False memory 1/20th of a second later: What the early onset of boundary extension reveals about perception. Psychological Science, 19, 1007-1014.

Mruczek, R. E. B., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2007). Activity of inferior temporal cortical neurons predicts recognition choice behavior and recognition time during visual search. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2825-2836.

Van Zoest, W., & Donk, M. (2010). Awareness of the saccade goal in oculomotor selection: Your eyes go before you know. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 861-871.

Velichkovsky, B. M., Dornhoefer, S. M., Kopf, M., Helmert, J., & Joos, M. (2002). Change detection and occlusion modes in road-traffic scenarios. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 99-109.

Wittenberg, M., Bremmer, F., & Wachtler, T. (2008). Perceptual evidence for saccadic updating of color stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8(14):9, 1-9, http://journalofvision.org/8/14/9/, doi:10.1167/8.14.9.

Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41, 3567-3585.

Gaze Control/Selection by Eye

Beck, M. R., Peterson, M. S., Boot, W. R., Vomela, M., & Kramer, A. F. (2006). Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 150-174.

Boot, W. R., McCarley, J. S, Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 854-861.

Dickinson, C. A., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2005). Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1120-1126.

Holm, L., & Mäntylä, T. (2007). Memory for scenes: Refixations reflect retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1664-1674.

Mäntylä, T., & Holm, L. (2006). Gaze control and recollective experience in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 14, 365-386.

McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & Peterson, M. S. (2002). Overt and covert object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 751-758.